Wednesday, September 30, 2009

The Difference Between Entrepreneur and Executive

It is an unwritten rule in the economy that once a company goes to the stock exchange, it must be replaced, the original founder. Myth: Entrepreneurs are responsible for getting a business started great, but not so great if Wall Street is looking over his shoulder. Part of this thinking is that founders are solitary, passionate offenders with a vision in her unconventional approach to manage and direct - the sort of rabble rousing that investors make uneasy. (What's rabble rousinganyway?)

Passionate in their approach, some little more than television preacher, the gospel of its corporate work for all worth it, but when faced with real management challenges, its methods are found in a house of cards is seen.

To put it mildly, this is a gross generalization, and very inaccurate.

Case in point, Steve Jobs was an entrepreneur with a vision - create the largest user-friendly computer in the world and took a byte (pun intended) ofIBM's market dominance. Passionate and visionary who had jobs in his corner, Steve Wozniak, to treat the structure of Apple. Before these guys, working on an extensive knowledge of computer code requires only a simple task to be done. Many computer science major, looked at those who could not understand the basics of a computer. Then Apple came and changed all that pose the invention, a user computer that requires no code, plug in any programming skills, and easy to play. With theirvisually intuitive interface, Apple's new, what defines the work of thought on the computer. They changed the computer industry by providing more computers for the rest of us.

So, it was not a mystery why the Mac computer has been the choice for graphic designers - with its focus on the graphical user interface and ease of use out of the box, an Apple might be used by anyone. Before the Macintosh, were all set in advertising agencies and design firms will be sent to set up a kind of house inThe neat rows you see in magazines and newspapers. You never knew what would look the way until he came back. A wrong calculation could ruin a piece. Calculation of the writings was a science just too thinly designers with a penchant for mathematics. With applications such as Pagemaker and WYSIWYG (What You See Is What You Get) interface, Apple's independent record companies ruined overnight. Now, all could be set at the home of your Desktop, and changes could be performed,immediately. Apple was the David slew Goliath, and that Apple buyers at a cult-like obsession began.

But it was not good at Apple. Jobs' direction for the company seemed at odds with CEO John Sculley. A power struggle ensued and the Board of Directors sided with Sculley - Jobs was forced, and the press had a field day. To an outsider it made no sense. To an experienced man of business, it was not soon enough. The founder, whose ideology that brought the company's currentLevel of profitability and reputation seen as an obstacle to the next phase of success. The myth of the entrepreneur, not in a position to advance the company enforced.

First, the management team of Apple on a road where there had never been adopted, and the profits of the evidence that all worked. The time, however, would say that a new CEO, several years in sales and lack of gloss low stock price enough to excite even the most experienced board of directors that they may have aMistake. The Macintosh started to look like an IBM clone. Just another computer.

For obvious reasons, Jobs was put back in 97, and the Apple brand began to make a comeback. The entrepreneurial spirit again stopped, and Apple products that looked like gray boxes and started to return to their ergonomic design, industrial design. Lessons learned from NEXT Jobs' computer system has been in the new Power Mac line-integrated, and the iMac, the Apple brand back toProfitability. This was an entrepreneur with executive and strategic implementation.

Jobs has the passion back to Apple. The myth of the entrepreneur was broken. And let us not forget, investment jobs in Pixar before it was acquired by Disney. Do not understand So much for the myth of the entrepreneur to real business.

Learned Conversely, managers, emerged through the ranks of Wharton, Yale and Harvard, the ropes of hard work and crunching numbers, and finally landing a majorLeadership for quite a lot of seasoning, are equally valid. Many a business needs to operate this type of administration, and with over 50 million businesses in the United States, I would say most of them under this management structure.

Look at the number of the rule of law, accounting and engineering firms that have serious systems to operate on. This is not just a happy coincidence, it tried and true business 101 Many executives have taken to clean up timesthe mess created by one of the founders who do not know better.

One of my favorite examples of case studies, remediation is Harley Davidson. AMF Harley-drove the name back into the ground in the 70s by firing employees and streamlining of production to such an extent that was the laughing stock of Harley-Davidson motorcycle industry. In an effort to press for greater and greater profits, forgot AMF make a superior product. It did not take long for the Japanese imports of higher quality to takeFlooding the American market.

In 1981 AMF Harley sales led to a group of investors by Vaughn Beals and Willie G. Davidson (who, yes, the grandson of the founder William A. Davidson) for 80 million U.S. dollars. To hold back their market share, while imports from Japan in check, Harley Davidson worked closely with the U.S. International Trade Commission, and urged them to impose a 45% tariff on imported bikes over 700cc's. This was a temporary measure designed to protect and increase the price of Harleyof imports from Japan. It was the helping hand that held the competition at bay.

The next step was to increase the quality while keeping costs low. In Japan after World War II W. Edwards Deming a productivity model with a simple method of stock orders only created if necessary. Prior to his methods, companies generally still large quantities of product in warehouses. It was expensive to store, heat and / or "cool" and expensive to insure. And when inventory fell, you were stuck with overpriced goods.Assembly could be with such a loss that a company could withdraw from the business.

Deming was the father of just-in-time production and for good reason - he single-handedly helped to build up Japan after the Second World War. JIT focused on order inventory only when needed, but above all, gave workers on the assembly plant floor control over product quality, including the authority to shut down the line when a part or finished product does not meet their standards. Quality over quantity.

Harley's executiveManagement made aware of what their company known - the macho "retro" appeal of the machines, building motorcycles that deliberately adopted the look and feel of their earlier cycles returned with our customer-requested modifications. Components such as brakes, were forks, shock absorbers, carburetors, electrical parts and wheels from foreign manufacturers and quality are enhanced awarded, made technological improvements, and buyers slowly returned.

With JIT methods, and a return toQuality, reputation began to grow Harley Davidson in the premium brand it is today. They even went so far to the U.S. International Trade Commission for the abolition of customs duties collected previously. Because people are still buying Japanese imported cycles at a premium, if the duties were lifted, the price remained the same, and Harley allow an even higher premium to be calculated.

Today's Harley-brands include traditional bikes like the Fat Boy, and female bikers focused brands such asthe Sportster, and the cafe racer inspired V-Rod with his retro look. Solid management Harley Davidson brought back from the edge of Oblivion.

But what we can learn both styles of management? First, we define the two positions. The dictionary defines the entrepreneur as "an organized, that a company operates, provided that the risk for the benefit of profit." This individual many times does allow all roles in a company to profit and / or investorsStaffing.

And a leader is as "one who manages or administers defined questions of a company's activities." In other words, oversees the management of the structure and the day-to-day for the board, the owners, or investors. The compensation may take the form of benefits, stock options or bonuses.

Either way, it seems as if the contractor works for himself and the executive works for the investors.

So what can managers and entrepreneurs fromWhat can executives learn from entrepreneurs?

Entrepreneurs need to understand that a transaction (s) should run without them. System and the structure must be performed by management and each member of a company should know his / her role. Invest as venture capitalists and bankers in a new start-ups, it's the first thing to look for it - the corporate structure. The passionate nature of the founders, they can get to the table, but it's true, day-to-day business management looking for them. LookRay Kroc, founder of McDonalds. He created methods for producing close every product on the menu. In a business where profit margins are very narrow, Kroc showed investors that its structure guarantees profits, whether he was there or not.

Executives, on the other side should take a page out of the business by the numbers and go well with her. When the Mazda MX introduced, all the marketing information out there, nothing open on a small sports car. It was theLast thing on the minds of American consumers. But Mazda has been the unthinkable - a passion she again sat in the driving fun and affordable roadster, which brought back the days of the British MG Midgets and on weekends in the country.

The Miata made them look like geniuses. Had she expected some sort of market-trend? The fact is, they did nothing of the sort. Mazda has a chance that pays big time. Make excitement back into driving. Period. Consumers buy because it is an emotionalReason to buy. Not reveal numbers crunching passion.

The balance between the principal methods vs. Executive is a simple paradigm - it is right-brained thinking over the left-brain thinking. To actually take the business world, we must integrate both. Look at the leaders you admire the most. If you look closely, you'll see that it works both the sense of passion for what they are working while balancing systems and the integration of a structure during itsAbsence.

Jack Welch is a good example of someone who both sides of the entrepreneurs and executives balances. He was very open CEO of General Electric for more than 40 years. Passionate and severe, he became a mini-celebrities on the Tonight Show with Jay Leno, many times. He held the bread and butter part of GE (large turbines, electric motors, stuff that does not see the consumer) robust, with a balance (between the consumer goods television sets, refrigerators, washing machines, etc.)with their Financial Services. He actually played both roles.

Well, since he retired, he is also looking for speakers, for obvious reasons - he knows how to run a company on both sides.

Look at Lee Iacocca, former president Bill Clinton, John Johnson, Mary Kay Ash, Donald Trump, Malcolm Forbes, Warren Buffet, Tony Robbins, Hilary Clinton, former HP CEO Carly Fiorina, etc. All are reflections of a balance between mind an entrepreneur and corporate management strategy.The balance between passion and discipline is what drives it all.

When Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart had once said: "Neither a high degree of intelligence nor imagination nor both together go to the making of genius." Love, love, love that the soul of genius. "

The funny thing is one of the sons of Mozart, Franz Xaver Wolfgang was rumored to be a better, more disciplined musician than his father, but Xavier shyness only allowed him to focus on implementation - with their backs to the audience. Based onWorking in the shadow of his famous father was too hard, and despite touring extensively, he faded into history. And there it is again - the passion of the entrepreneur and the logic of the executive.

The balance between the two seems to be the road less traveled, but it is the greatest reward. Finally, my experience in this area extensively, I can only recommend that to find if you are a business structure to learn and build, if you are an executive, what is your passionBusiness and show it. The results will astonish.

Thank you for reading,

Brad

BTW: When Mac users talk about their computers, iPods and iPhones, they tend to use words like "I love my Mac." Strong words for an inanimate object, but that Apple is the target audience. They have an emotional attachment to Apple products. Most entrepreneurs dream about this kind of customer loyalty. How do you turn loya in cult-like fanatics? Ask Steve Jobs and Guy Kawasaki. Them,In my book, are the masters. Know your audience and you will know their passions.

Even Apple breaks the mold as a company. You are one of the few manufacturers that offer consumer products and content. It's like a TV manufacturer to the shows. But unlike Sony, who just do not, that are Apple's profit margin percentages relative to sales to the manufacturing sector are much more lucrative. Verticle one of the best models I've ever seen.

This article and my blogs, articles, andDesigns, etc. .. are on a MacBook Pro with a 17-inch screen, and yes, I love my Mac created.

Also I am not a fan of over analysis, especially when it comes to basic human nature. Entrepreneurs from the hip shooting and strategic management. You build start-ups, the latter maintains and builds equity. What is there to analyze?

Here are some "lite" reading on the topic:



No comments:

Post a Comment